CRPC §292BNSS §328

Evidence of officers of the Mint

Substantively sameConfidence: mediumStatus: cross checked
Last updated 2026-05-01 · Input coverage: full

Compiled by AI-assisted tools. Verify current status against official sources. Last updated: 2026-04-28.

Jump to section

Comparison

Old law
CRPC §292
Evidence of officers of the Mint

292. Evidence of officers of the Mint.—(1) Any document purporting to be a report under the hand of any such 2[officer of any Mint or of any Note Printing Press or of any Security Printing Press (including the officer of the Controller of Stamps and Stationery) or of any Forensic Department or Division of Forensic Science Laboratory or any Government Examiner of Questioned Documents or any State Examiner of Questioned Documents, as the case may be,] as the Central Government may, by notification, specify in this behalf, upon any matter or thing duly submitted to him for examination and report in the course of any proceeding under this Code, may be used as evidence in any inquiry, trial or other proceeding under this Code, although such officer is not called as a witness.

(2) The Court may, if it thinks fit, summon and examine any such officer as to the subject-matter of his report: Provided that no such officer shall be summoned to produce any records on which the report is based.

(3) Without prejudice to the provisions of sections 123 and 124 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (1 of 1872), no such officer shall, 2[except with the permission of the General Manager or any officer in charge of any Mint or of any Note Printing Press or of any Security Printing Press or of any Forensic Department or any officer in charge of the Forensic Science Laboratory or of the Government Examiner of Questioned Documents Organisation or of the State Examiner of Questioned Documents Organisation, as the case may be,] be permitted— (a) to give any evidence derived from any unpublished official records on which the report is based; or (b) to disclose the nature or particulars of any test applied by him in the course of the examination of the matter or thing.

New law
BNSS §328
Evidence of officers of Mint. Sec.1]

328.

(1) Any document purporting to be a report under the hand of a gazetted officer of any Mint or of any Note Printing Press or of any Security Printing Press (including the officer of the Controller of Stamps and Stationery) or of any Forensic Department or Division of Forensic Science Laboratory or any Government Examiner of Questioned Documents or any State Examiner of Questioned Documents as the Central Government may, by notification, specify in this behalf, upon any matter or thing duly submitted to him for examination and report in the course of any proceeding under this Sanhita, may be used as evidence in any inquiry, trial or other proceeding under this Sanhita, although such officer is not called as a witness.

(2) The Court may, if it thinks fit, summon and examine any such officer as to the subject-matter of his report: Provided that no such officer shall be summoned to produce any records on which the report is based.

(3) Without prejudice to the provisions of sections 129 and 130 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, no such officer shall, except with the permission of the General Manager or any officer in charge of any Mint or of any Note Printing Press or of any Security Printing Press or of any Forensic Department or any officer in charge of the Forensic Science Laboratory or of the Government Examiner of Questioned Documents Organisation or of the State Examiner of Questioned Documents Organisation be permitted— (a) to give any evidence derived from any unpublished official records on which the report is based; or Deposition of medical witness. Identification report of Magistrate. Evidence of officers of (b) to disclose the nature or particulars of any test applied by him in the course of the examination of the matter or thing.

What changedAI-inferred

Evidence of officers of Mint.

Old position

CrPC 292 is concerned with Evidence of officers of the Mint. Evidence of officers of the Mint

New position

BNSS 328 preserves the framework with drafting modernisations as required by the new code. Topic: Evidence of officers of Mint. Sec.1]. Any document purporting to be a report under the hand of a gazetted officer of any Mint or of any Note Printing Press or of any Security Printing Press (including the officer of the Controller of Stamps and Stationery) or of any Forensic

BNSS 328 (Evidence of officers of Mint. Sec.1]) preserves the framework of CrPC 292. BNSS 328 retains the operative provisions in substantively the same form, with drafting modernisation and structural updates as required by the new code. BNSS 328 text: Any document purporting to be a report...

Editorial deltaAI-indicated (source-linked)

BNSS 328 (Evidence of officers of Mint. Sec.1]) preserves the framework of CrPC 292. BNSS 328 retains the operative provisions in substantively the same form, with drafting modernisation and structural updates as required by the new code.

BNSS 328 text: Any document purporting to be a report under the hand of a gazetted officer of any Mint or of any Note Printing Press or of any Security Printing Press (including the officer of the Controller of Stamps and Stationery) or of any Forensic Department or Division of Forensic Science Laboratory or any Government Examiner...

Transitional note (repeal & savings)

For matters initiated before 1 July 2024, CrPC 292 continues to apply. For matters from that date forward, BNSS 328 applies. The transition is governed by the repeal-and-savings clause in the new code (BNS 358 / BNSS 531 / BSA 170 as the case may be); pending proceedings under the old code carry forward unaffected.

Frequently asked

BNSS 328 (Evidence of officers of Mint. Sec.1]). The relationship is classified as substantively_same — see the change-note above for the textual delta.

Sources

Cite this page

Newlaws.in, CRPC §292 → BNSS §328 Mapping Page, last updated 2026-05-01, accessed 2026-06-12, https://newlaws.in/crpc/292.

Compiled using AI-assisted tools · Source-linked · Last updated 2026-05-01

Not legal advice. Verify against the bare act and consult a qualified advocate for any specific matter.