CRPC §325BNSS §364

Procedure when Magistrate cannot pass sentence sufficiently severe. 13

Substantively sameConfidence: mediumStatus: cross checked
Last updated 2026-05-01 · Input coverage: full

Compiled by AI-assisted tools. Verify current status against official sources. Last updated: 2026-04-28.

Jump to section

Comparison

Old law
CRPC §325
Procedure when Magistrate cannot pass sentence sufficiently severe. 13

325. Procedure when Magistrate cannot pass sentence sufficiently severe.—(1) Whenever a Magistrate is of opinion, after hearing the evidence for the prosecution and the accused, that the accused is guilty, and that he ought to receive a punishment different in kind from, or more severe than, that which such Magistrate is empowered to inflict, or, being a Magistrate of the second class, is of opinion that the accused ought to be required to execute a bond under section 106, he may record the opinion and submit his proceedings, and forward the accused, to the Chief Judicial Magistrate to whom he is subordinate.

(2) When more accused than one are being tried together, and the Magistrate considers it necessary to proceed under sub-section (1), in regard to any of such accused, he shall forward all the accused, who are in his opinion guilty, to the Chief Judicial Magistrate. 1. Ins. by Act 45 of 1978, s. 26 (w.e.f. 18-12-1978).

(3) The Chief Judicial Magistrate to whom the proceedings are submitted may, if he thinks fit, examine the parties and recall and examine any witness who has already given evidence in the case and may call for and take any further evidence and shall pass such judgment, sentence or order in the case as he thinks fit, and is according to law.

New law
BNSS §364
when Magistrate cannot pass sentence sufficiently

364.

(1) Whenever a Magistrate is of opinion, after hearing the evidence for the prosecution and the accused, that the accused is guilty, and that he ought to receive a punishment different in kind from, or more severe than, that which such Magistrate is empowered to inflict, or, being a Magistrate of the second class, is of opinion that the accused ought to be required to execute a bond or bail bond under section 125, he may record the opinion and submit his proceedings, and forward the accused, to the Chief Judicial Magistrate to whom he is subordinate.

(2) When more accused persons than one are being tried together, and the Magistrate considers it necessary to proceed under sub-section (1), in regard to any of such accused, he shall forward all the accused, who are in his opinion guilty, to the Chief Judicial Magistrate.

(3) The Chief Judicial Magistrate to whom the proceedings are submitted may, if he thinks fit, examine the parties and recall and examine any witness who has already given evidence in the case and may call for and take any further evidence and shall pass such judgment, sentence or order in the case as he thinks fit, and is according to law.

What changedAI-inferred

Procedure when Magistrate cannot pass sentence sufficiently severe.

Old position

CrPC 325 is concerned with Procedure when Magistrate cannot pass sentence sufficiently severe. 13. Procedure when Magistrate cannot pass sentence sufficiently severe

New position

BNSS 364 preserves the framework with drafting modernisations as required by the new code. Topic: when Magistrate cannot pass sentence sufficiently. Whenever a Magistrate is of opinion, after hearing the evidence for the prosecution and the accused, that the accused is guilty, and that he ought to receive a punishment different in kind from, or more severe than, that which such

BNSS 364 (when Magistrate cannot pass sentence sufficiently) preserves the framework of CrPC 325. BNSS 364 retains the operative provisions in substantively the same form, with drafting modernisation and structural updates as required by the new code. BNSS 364 text: Whenever a Magistrate is of...

Editorial deltaAI-indicated (source-linked)

BNSS 364 (when Magistrate cannot pass sentence sufficiently) preserves the framework of CrPC 325. BNSS 364 retains the operative provisions in substantively the same form, with drafting modernisation and structural updates as required by the new code.

BNSS 364 text: Whenever a Magistrate is of opinion, after hearing the evidence for the prosecution and the accused, that the accused is guilty, and that he ought to receive a punishment different in kind from, or more severe than, that which such Magistrate is empowered to inflict, or, being a Magistrate of the second class, is of...

Transitional note (repeal & savings)

For matters initiated before 1 July 2024, CrPC 325 continues to apply. For matters from that date forward, BNSS 364 applies. The transition is governed by the repeal-and-savings clause in the new code (BNS 358 / BNSS 531 / BSA 170 as the case may be); pending proceedings under the old code carry forward unaffected.

Frequently asked

BNSS 364 (when Magistrate cannot pass sentence sufficiently). The relationship is classified as substantively_same — see the change-note above for the textual delta.

Sources

Cite this page

Newlaws.in, CRPC §325 → BNSS §364 Mapping Page, last updated 2026-05-01, accessed 2026-06-12, https://newlaws.in/crpc/325.

Compiled using AI-assisted tools · Source-linked · Last updated 2026-05-01

Not legal advice. Verify against the bare act and consult a qualified advocate for any specific matter.