IPC §29A → BNS §2
“Electronic record”
Jump to section
Comparison
2[29A. “Electronic record”.—The words “electronic record” shall have the meaning assigned to them in clause (t) of sub-section
(1) of section 2 of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (21 of 2000).]
In this Sanhita, unless the context otherwise requires,—
What changedAI-inferred
BNS does not carry an IPC-29A-equivalent stand-alone cross-reference. The function is split-absorbed across two BNS provisions operating at different layers: BNS 2(8) performs semantic absorption — the document definition now textually includes electronic and digital record; BNS 2(39) is the umbrella external-definition rule, which makes the IT Act, 2000 (and the BNSS, 2023) automatically supply the meaning of any term used in BNS without internal definition. The IT Act's definition of electronic record remains the substantive source.
Old position
IPC Section 29A was a one-line cross-reference inserted by the Information Technology Act, 2000. It assigned electronic record the meaning given in clause (t) of sub-section (1) of section 2 of the IT Act, 2000. The section did not carry its own definitional content — its function was purely to import the IT Act's definition into the IPC framework.
New position
BNS does not carry an IPC-29A-equivalent stand-alone cross-reference. The function is split-absorbed across two BNS provisions operating at different layers: BNS 2(8) performs semantic absorption — the document definition now textually includes electronic and digital record; BNS 2(39) is the umbrella external-definition rule, which makes the IT Act, 2000 (and the BNSS, 2023) automatically supply the meaning of any term used in BNS without internal definition. The IT Act's definition of electronic record remains the substantive source.
Editorial deltaAI-indicated (source-linked)
IPC Section 29A was a one-line cross-reference inserted by the Information Technology Act, 2000: The words 'electronic record' shall have the meaning assigned to them in clause (t) of sub-section (1) of section 2 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. BNS does not carry an IPC-29A-equivalent stand-alone provision. The function is split-absorbed into two BNS provisions, which operate at different layers: BNS 2(8) is semantic absorption — document now textually includes electronic and digital record, so within the document context the cross-reference is no longer needed; BNS 2(39) is the interpretive fallback rule — for any term used in BNS without an internal definition, the meaning assigned in the Information Technology Act, 2000 (or the BNSS, 2023) carries through. The IT Act's definition of electronic record is the substantive source in both layers; what changed is the routing mechanism, from a section-specific cross-reference to two complementary mechanisms in BNS Section 2.
Transitional note (repeal & savings)
For matters initiated before 1 July 2024, IPC 29A continues to apply. For matters from that date forward, BNS 2 applies. The transition is governed by the repeal-and-savings clause in the new code (BNS 358 / BNSS 531 / BSA 170 as the case may be); pending proceedings under the old code carry forward in their existing frame.
Frequently asked
None as a stand-alone section. IPC 29A's cross-reference function is distributed across BNS 2(8) (which directly includes electronic and digital record in the document definition) and BNS 2(39) (the umbrella external-definition rule pointing to the IT Act, 2000 and the BNSS, 2023). The IT Act remains the source of the term's meaning.
Sources
- India Code — Indian Penal Code, 1860 (pending verification)
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — bare act PDF (Gazette of India, 25 December 2023; Act No. 45 of 2023)
- Information Technology Act, 2000 — section 2(1)(t) (substantive source of 'electronic record')
Cite this page
Newlaws.in, IPC §29A → BNS §2 Mapping Page, last updated 2026-05-01, accessed 2026-06-12, https://newlaws.in/ipc/29A.
Compiled using AI-assisted tools · Source-linked · Last updated 2026-05-01
Not legal advice. Verify against the bare act and consult a qualified advocate for any specific matter.