BNSS §414

Appeal from orders requiring security or refusal to accept or rejecting surety for or good behaviour.

Substantively sameConfidence: mediumStatus: cross checked
Last updated 2026-05-01 · Input coverage: full

Compiled by AI-assisted tools. Verify current status against official sources. Last updated: 2026-04-28.

Jump to section

Comparison

Old law
CRPC §373
Appeal from orders requiring security or refusal to accept or rejecting surety for keeping peace or good behaviour

373. Appeal from orders requiring security or refusal to accept or rejecting surety for keeping peace or good behaviour.—Any person,— (i) who has been ordered under section 117 to give security for keeping the peace or for good behaviour, or (ii) who is aggrieved by any order refusing to accept or rejecting a surety under section 121, may appeal against such order to the Court of Session: Provided that nothing in this section shall apply to persons the proceedings against whom are laid before a Sessions Judge in accordance with the provisions of sub-section

(2) or sub-section

(4) of section 122.

New law
BNSS §414
Appeal from orders requiring security or refusal to accept or rejecting surety for or good behaviour.

414. Any person,— (i) who has been ordered under section 136 to give security for keeping the peace or for good behaviour; or (ii) who is aggrieved by any order refusing to accept or rejecting a surety under section 140, may appeal against such order to the Court of Session: Provided that nothing in this section shall apply to persons the proceedings against whom are laid before a Sessions Judge in accordance with the provisions of sub-section

(2) or sub-section

(4) of section 141.

What changedAI-inferred

Appeal from orders requiring security or refusal to accept or rejecting surety for keeping peace.

Old position

CrPC 373 is concerned with Appeal from orders requiring security or refusal to accept or rejecting surety for keeping peace or good behaviour. Appeal from orders requiring security or refusal to accept or rejecting surety for keeping peace or good behaviour

New position

BNSS 414 preserves the framework with drafting modernisations as required by the new code. Topic: Appeal from orders requiring security or refusal to accept or rejecting surety for or good behaviour.. Any person,

BNSS 414 (Appeal from orders requiring security or refusal to accept or rejecting surety for or good behaviour.) preserves the framework of CrPC 373. BNSS 414 retains the operative provisions in substantively the same form, with drafting modernisation and structural updates as required by the new...

Editorial deltaAI-indicated (source-linked)

BNSS 414 (Appeal from orders requiring security or refusal to accept or rejecting surety for or good behaviour.) preserves the framework of CrPC 373. BNSS 414 retains the operative provisions in substantively the same form, with drafting modernisation and structural updates as required by the new code.

BNSS 414 text: Any person,— (i) who has been ordered under section 136 to give security for keeping the peace or for good behaviour; or (ii) who is aggrieved by any order refusing to accept or rejecting a surety under section 140, may appeal against such order to the Court of Session: Provided that nothing in this section shall...

Transitional note (repeal & savings)

For matters initiated before 1 July 2024, CrPC 373 continues to apply. For matters from that date forward, BNSS 414 applies. The transition is governed by the repeal-and-savings clause in the new code (BNS 358 / BNSS 531 / BSA 170 as the case may be); pending proceedings under the old code carry forward unaffected.

Frequently asked

BNSS 414 (Appeal from orders requiring security or refusal to accept or rejecting surety for or good behaviour.). The relationship is classified as substantively_same — see the change-note above for the textual delta.

Sources

Cite this page

Newlaws.in, CRPC §373 → BNSS §414 Mapping Page, last updated 2026-05-01, accessed 2026-06-15, https://newlaws.in/bnss/414.

Compiled using AI-assisted tools · Source-linked · Last updated 2026-05-01

Not legal advice. Verify against the bare act and consult a qualified advocate for any specific matter.